Looking Forward. By Michael Albert and Robin Hahnel

 Go to Table of Contents

 

  Prologue

 

 All who are not lunatics are agreed about certain things. That it is better to  be alive than dead, better to be adequately fed than starved, better to be free than a slave. Many people desire those things only for themselves and their friends; they are quite content that their enemies should suffer. These people can be refuted by science: Humankind has become so much one family that we cannot insure our own prosperity except by insuring that of everyone else. If you wish to be happy yourself, you must resign yourself to  seeing others also happy.

  - Bertrand Russell

The Science to Save Us From Science

 

The Big Lie

 

Explaining the Orwellian semantics of the Heilbronian under­standing of the twentieth century, Noam Chomsky tells us in Language and Politics (Black Rose Books) that since the Bolshevik revolution, "both of the major world propaganda systems have described this destruction of socialist elements as a victory of socialism. For western capitalism, the purpose is to defame socialism by associating it with Moscow's tyranny; for the Bolsheviks, the purpose was to gain legitimacy by appealing to the goals of authentic socialism." In line with our own analysis, Chomsky also notes that "particularly since 1917, Marxism - or more accurately, Marxism - Leninism has become, as Bakunin predicted, the ideology of a 'new class' of revolutionary intelligentsia who exploit popular revolutionary struggles to seize state power. They proceed to impose a harsh and authoritarian rule to destroy socialist institutions, as Lenin and Trotsky destroyed the factory councils and soviets. They will also do what they can to undermine and destroy moves toward authentic socialism elsewhere, if only because of the ideological threat." Moreover, he adds, "this two - pronged ideological assault, combined with other devices available to those with real power, has dealt a severe blow to libertarian socialist currents that once had considerable vitality, though the popular commitments to such ideals constantly reveal themselves in many ways."

 

But to rebut the "two - pronged assault," in the same volume Chomsky tells an interviewer that "My own hopes and intuitions are that self - fulfilling and creative work is a fundamental human need, and that the pleasures of a challenge met, work well done, the exercise of skill and craftsmanship, are real and significant, and are an essential part of a full and meaningful life. The same is true of the opportunity to understand and enjoy the achievements of others, which often go beyond what we ourselves can do, and to work constructively in cooperation with others.... The task for a modern industrial society is to achieve what is now technically realizable, namely a society which is really based on free voluntary participation of people who produce and create, live their lives freely within institutions they control, and with limited hierarchical structures, possibly none at all."

 

And that is our purpose in this book. Not merely to help people understand the U.S. economy. Not to change it to a different form of class rule. But to help make it classless by reorganizing production, consumption, and allocation to elevate social solidarity, collective self - management, and productive diversity to the highest priority, reducing hierarchical structures until there are "possibly none at all."

To consign egalitarian and participatory sentiments to the ashcan of history on the grounds that the coordinator economies of the East have crumbled under the dead weight of their own authoritianism, inequity, and hypocrisy is a convenient nonsequitor for champions of capitalism. In the East people are currently seeking liberty. We should hope they are not sidetracked by Twinkies, Toyotas, and the manipulations of their leaders, eager to enjoy the even greater advantages that capitalism offers them. While the economic vision put forward in this book is motivated by activism in the United States, we think it is equally relevant and perhaps more timely for dissidents to the East, and, for that matter, to the South.

 

- Michael Albert and Robin Hahnel

 December 1990