Sexism Vs Racism & the Democratic Candidates

I formed my activist perspective during the late 80s as various syntheses of the 60s social movements were being offered, such as tri-systems (gender, race, class) socialist-feminism by Ann Ferguson, and complementary holism by South End press collective. There was a lot of talk about how to incorporate anti-racism into things like
socialism and feminism. In a perfect world, we’d have a black woman running, so that this sort of divided loyalties would not occur, but here we are. Barbara Ehrenreich, one of my favorite socialist-feminists, has come out in support of Obama.

I voted in the Green primary in my state, but I know that only a Dem or Republican will get into the presidency this round, probably for at least the next decade. I will vote for the Green candidate, hopefully Cynthia McKinney, but even Nader is more progressive than Obama or Hillary. As for whether Hillary or Obama is "more" progressive, I
would say that Obama has a shorter record, so may have a few less strings attached to his use of power, but that will change if he gets into office. On the issues, there is a mixed record. On Iraq, Obama was more consistent in opposing the war, but has voted for the war in a few cases, Hillary in more cases. On abortion, Obama has mostly been solidly pro-choice, but his attempts to woo Evangelicals away from Republicans has led to a dialogue stance on the issue. One could say he talks compromise, but votes solidly pro-choice. Hillary is as
solid, if not more solid. She, too, has offered olive branches to pro-lifers who consider voting Democrat.

As I do a sampling of their websites, flipping back and forth on various issues that concern me, I find both of them playing to the center, but also saying things that I agree are reforms that are in a left direction. Obama seems slightly more generous, on healthcare, education, poverty, and climate change. Since I’ve already voted and
will probably vote for the Greens, I don’t know if I want to make up my mind on the complicated question of who’s more progressive. Either of them is better than McCain. The only value I can see in deciding for one over the other is that I can try and influence those Democratic voters still have primaries ahead of them. My influence is
pretty tiny, so I leave that to others.

There is no way, as far as I can see, to decide that racism has created more total world suffering than has sexism. Racism has some extremely brutal consequences and most of the world is non-white and poorer. Sexism afflicts 50% of the planet off the bat, and males suffer under it, especially gay men and boys. All children as well grow up in a sexist world. I am a both/and kind of guy. I don’t want to choose between racism and sexism. If forced to choose, I would have to be given very distinct factual reasons for doing so. I suspect that in some cases the scales tip to one side of the other, but over all, they cancel each other out, both racism and sexism are terrible.

Peace! Charley

Leave a comment