â€œMelbourne University Publishing should drop this whole disgusting project. If they proceed, I urge the Australian Jewish community, and particularly The Australian Jewish News, to treat it with dignified silence. That is our best response. If, God forbid, it is published, don’t give them a dollar. Don’t buy the book.â€
Federal Labor MP Michael Danby, Australian Jewish News, August 25 2005
Iâ€™m currently writing a book on the Israel/Palestine conflict with Melbourne University Publishing (MUP) and itâ€™s due to be released in May 2006. After my articles on the subject to various publications around the world, I was already used to Jews and non-Jews writing and calling with abuse and outright hatred. After my recent column on the Gaza withdrawal, a Sydney doctor emailed me and asked: â€œHow well do you think you would be doing with a name like yours if Adolf would have won?â€ and â€œAs far as your book goes, I might just take a page out of Hitler’s book on that one.â€
â€œThe degree of abuse and outright threats now being directed at anyone – academic, analyst, reporter – who dares to criticise Israel (or dares to tell the truth about the Palestinian uprising) is fast reaching McCarthyite proportionsâ€, wrote Robert Fisk in December 2000. â€œThe attempt to force the media to obey Israel’s rules is now internationalâ€. The situation has only worsened since 9/11.
In late August, Jewish Federal Labor MP Michael Danby wrote a letter to the Australian Jewish News (AJN) and demanded MUP â€œshould drop this whole disgusting project.â€ He claimed that MUP head, Louise Adler, had made comments about Israel and himself that were plainly false. He wanted to â€œabsolutely disassociate himselfâ€ from the book because it would be little more than a â€œpropaganda tractâ€ and â€œan attack on the mainstream Australian Jewish community.â€
The exact reason and timing behind his attack remains unclear though after Danbyâ€™s refusal to answer some innocuous questions of mine in late 2004 â€“ his right, to be sure â€“ he seemed to be flagging his disapproval of even debating issues related to the Middle East question. This was true to form. He had slammed me in the past and has a long history of attempting to stop open debate on Israel-related matters.
Leaving aside the irony of a Jewish parliamentarian calling for the censorship of a book that didnâ€™t yet exist, itâ€™s worth remembering Danby is the member for Melbourne Ports, the electorate with the greatest numbers of Jews in Australia [Malcolm Turnbullâ€™s Wentworth is not far behind.] He sees his role as defender of the Israeli cause and he articulates what he believes his constituents want to hear.
Online magazine Crikey picked up the story and asked whether it was appropriate for an MP to call for a boycott of an unpublished book. A few days later, Danby responded to Crikey, denied he had called for censorship and labeled my views on Israel â€œdisgusting.â€ He cautioned MUP – at a time when Israel was â€œmaking a painful withdrawal from Gazaâ€¦and when the prospects for peace are improvingâ€ â€“ against publishing books that he thought inappropriate for the times. It begged the question: did Danby truly believe that publishing companies should only produce work that accepted the status quo on issues, rather than challenging or maybe demolishing them?
The intentions of my book are ambitious. I believe that the Israel/Palestine conflict is the defining foreign affairs issue of our time and yet remains woefully misunderstood. Danby and numerous pro-Israel supporters are clearly confronted by me posing questions about Australiaâ€™s pro-Israel media, the Howard governmentâ€™s relationship with Israel and America, the role of the pro-Israel lobby, Americaâ€™s relationship with the Jewish state, my experiences in the Middle East, including through the Palestinian occupied territories and Jewish and Arab voices of dissent. I am a Jew who doesnâ€™t believe in the concept of a Jewish state, but then, I also donâ€™t believe in the idea of an Islamic or Christian entity either. There is surely room for a non-Zionist Jew to write about the true cost of Zionism both on Israel and the Diaspora.
A week after Danbyâ€™s boycott call, the AJN was filled with letters, including one from Louise Adler. â€œI am dismayed that a fellow publisher such as the AJN gives space for proposals to boycott ideasâ€, she wrote. â€œDanbyâ€™s proposal is inimical to the central Jewish values of tolerance and open debate.â€ Larry Stillman wrote that he fully understood the Danby agenda: â€œI suspect the book will be central of the predominance of conservative views in the Jewish community about the current state of Israel, Danby included.â€
The Melbourne Age entered the debate soon after, chastised Danby for denying he had called for my book to be banned and discovered yet more evidence of the MPâ€™s history of â€œventing sight unseen.â€ â€œIn the Jewish publication, The Review, he says of David Hareâ€™s Stuff Happens, â€˜I havnâ€™t seen the play, nor will Iâ€™, then cans it based on a review he read.â€ The leading broadsheet also compared the controversy to Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitzâ€™s failed attempt to ban Norman Finkelsteinâ€™s Beyond Chutzpah.
By the following week, the AJN was filled with coverage. A large news story featured another Danby justification for his attack. â€œIf I didnâ€™t tell people about it [Loewensteinâ€™s book] beforehand, knowing what his views are, would I be representing the people I represent?â€ he said. The paperâ€™s editorial entered the fray. Although critical of Danbyâ€™s censorship call, the AJN â€œunequivocally rejects Loewensteinâ€™s view of a Jewish state as â€˜fundamentally undemocratic and colonialist idea from a bygone eraâ€™â€, the public should wait for the bookâ€™s release â€œbefore we decide to consign it to the garbage heap of literature.â€ The letters pages were filled with both supportive and critical contributions, including from Danby himself. My ideas â€œstinkâ€ and he was simply â€œdoing what I was elected to do: speak up for the people I represent.â€ He again disingenuously denied having called for censorship.
A few days later, I received an unexpected call from well-known Jewish comedian Austen Tayshus. He demanded to know why I was writing my book, suggested Israel was a poor, defenceless Middle Eastern state threatened with annihilation, compared me to a German Jew who collaborated with the Nazis during the Second World War and asked why I had the right to air the community’s â€œdirty laundry.â€ I explained that he was clearly so insecure in his position that he felt the need to call and abuse me. I soon ended the call.
A few minutes after posting an entry on my blog about the initial call, I received another one from him. He said he would keep on calling me because I was an “ignoramus” and an “asshole.” He suggested we have a public debate, which I declined. He suggested Palestinian Hanan Ashrawi as a moderator (after telling me earlier that she was a “terrorist.”) The point of debating a man like this was negligible, for the simple fact that he didnâ€™t want to debate me – “a sad and lonely man”, in his words – nor actually discuss the issues. He wanted to shout and rant. It may have made him feel good about himself. He clearly needed it.
I told the Green Left Weekly the real fear behind Danbyâ€™s attack:
â€œThese sort of people donâ€™t want discussion, because discussion is threatening. Discussion means that more people are aware, or might become aware, of what actually does go on over there: What does occupation mean, what does it mean that Palestinians often have to wait hours at checkpoints in searing sun, what does it mean that women often have to give birth at checkpoints and often die? They donâ€™t want people to know that, for obvious reasons, because itâ€™s shameful. And they know if more people find out that kind of stuff, their view about Israel and the relationship between Australia and Israel could change.â€
During this controversy, I received many supportive emails and even financial donations to my website. Mannie De Saxe challenged Danby to put his words into action:
â€œIf Danby feels so passionate about Israel, and it is obvious that he does, why doesnâ€™t he take his supporters, all those vocal Zionists who, together with that publication which should be called the Israeli Zionist Times but is otherwise known as the Australian Jewish News, and move to Israel where Ariel Sharon has said that he needs all the Jews in the Diaspora to come and live to reduce anti-Semitism around the world.â€
I was extremely lucky that my publisher backed me 100% during this period. Many a publisher, I suspect, would have been scared to receive such vitriol months before the bookâ€™s release. I received some ugly comments on my blog â€“ â€œyou’re the nazi Anthony you fucking mental midget. Whose side are you on anyway? THINK about it toolheadâ€ â€“ but I remember what John Pilger told me recently; the more they attack you, the more youâ€™re having an effect and doing something right.
The difficulty in even raising questions related to Israel proves that serious debate is ever-more essential. The world is slowing waking up to the true reality in Israel and Palestine and Australians are joining the chorus of disapproval.