Looking
Forward. By Michael
Albert and Robin Hahnel 7. Workplace
Decision Making
|
|
"There is no
corresponding improvement in refrigerators that would warrant a four percent
jump in demand. Sally asks for a check on reasons people gave in a few
representative communities for requesting new refrigerators..."
|
The Intricacies
of "Working Overtime"
to Earn More "Income" Lydia, the
reader will recall, lives in a complex whose members are artistically
inclined. When not working at John Henry she works with a drama group that
puts on plays throughout the region. She likes this so much she spends more
time doing it than the time needed to balance her John Henry complex, but
since she considers it fun, she doesn't claim it as extra work. However,
Lydia wants to get a new computer this year to help her with design and
writing for the coming season. She could propose these in the plan as
investments for her drama group, but she knows they would not pass since the
need is not pressing. Lydia also has the option to "borrow" to make
the purchase herself-her Emma Goldman co-housing mates and others in the
neighborhood would be happy to oblige this request, especially since her
plays provide so much social well-being-but Lydia is not overly pleased with
committing herself to "pay back" a loan by consuming less in the
future. She prefers to work extra hours now to "earn" the right to
the extra consumption right away. She puts in a proposal to the plant facilitation board requesting
sufficient overtime to war-rant the extra consumption. She would prefer to
take less time for lunch and come in early or work later each day to working
on her days off or evenings since that's when she works with her drama group.
Once John Henry's plan is settled and the time comes to assign tasks, Lydia's
proposal is considered. Confident no one will protest-Lydia works hard, has
made few previous special requests, and the John Henry workers are the first
to enjoy her plays-facilitation workers assign Lydia the extra time she
requests subject to approval by the council as a whole. Matthew also requests extra work because, like last year and the year
before, he wants to ask for an above average consumption bundle. Matthew
wants to do the work at convenient times, an extra half hour daily three
times a week, for as long as needed. Facilitation workers doubt, however, that others will want to juggle
their work schedules to help Matthew still again, so they ask if he'd be
willing to come in Sundays to clean as his additional work. Matthew balks,
and his request goes unincorporated into the facilitation board proposal of
work assignments at John Henry. Although Matthew later argues his case to the
council, its response is the same as the facilitation workers'. He appeals,
to no effect, turns down the compromise offer to do overtime on Sundays, and
decides to look for a different primary workplace. In the meantime he goes
without the above average consumption he wanted. Evaluating and "Bartering"
During the period allowed for preparing the third proposal, Sally
decides the gap between what the steel industry as a whole has proposed and
what consumers have initially demanded is so large that filling the demand
would require a significant increase of steel production either at
considerable burden to current workers, or by transferring many workers from
other areas with disruptive effects. She, like many other steel workers,
decides to investigate the reasons for the high excess demand before putting
in her third round proposal. Of course, Sally is quite familiar with how John Henry steel is used.
She has a good overview of the whole economy and the role steel plays. She
thought the facilitation board's estimate of a three percent drop in demand
for this year-given the long term switch from steel to new high-tensile
alloys-was reasonable. Therefore, when she first heard it, Sally believed the
high demand must have been because some town or city was making a huge
request related to a major construction project they would modify quickly
seeing the excess demand for steel. She didn't do any serious checking on
demand but only on supply to see that John Henry was keeping pace with other
plants. But now she becomes interested in components of demand because they
must be diverging dramatically from what she expected. Her first
step is to set aside a couple of hours one evening to use one of her
complex's main database terminals to conduct her inquiries. Sally begins by
calling up statements regarding current proposals for steel supply and
demand, including a comparison of current demand proposals with last year's
final figures and with the facilitation boards' most recent predictions. Next, Sally
requests a breakdown of demand by industry and region to see the roots of the
increase. There could have been a generalized increase in demand for all products
requiring steel, but that would contradict the downward trend in steel use.
Sally finds that the demand jumps were common to quite a few regions, but not
all, and primarily centered in two industries. Apparently
citizens in Northern regions made unusually high demands for automobiles,
while people generally were making at least four percent higher than
anticipated requests for refrigerators. Because Sally herself hadn't made any
such requests she doesn't know what reasons might be at work. With a ten
percent increase in automobile requests in the northern regions, it seems
likely she could find the explanation with just a few well-conceived
inquiries. Thus, Sally next requests a sequence of print-outs including: 1. The
average commune and per capita request for automobiles in the relevant
regions as well as the national average, the average for other regions, last
year's national average, and the projection for this year. 2. A summary
of all changes in this year's car models. 3. A similar
summary of changes in refrigerators. With this
information, Sally sees that the new model cars have innovations that make
them more economical and efficient than last year's models for travel in the cold
and snow and she is a annoyed that facilitation workers didn't sufficiently
foresee increased demand for new cars in heavy-snow regions. There is no
corresponding improvement in refrigerators that would warrant a four percent
jump in demand. Sally asks for a check on reasons people gave in a few
representative communes for requesting new refrigerators and discovers an
inordinate number of people claiming their refrigerators were out of service.
Further research shows that a refrigerator model introduced five years ago is
now showing signs of unexpectedly low durability, leading to the unexpectedly
high requests for replacements. In light of
her findings, Sally recalculates her own proposals for production at John
Henry, scaling things up more than she had initially intended, but not quite
as much as consumers sought. She feels the refrigerator need is urgent, but
some of the people in the cold regions will simply have to manage without new
cars. She also adds her comments to the qualitative data base. Sally is
eager to see whether facilitation board workers will come to similar
conclusions in their revised projections for the next round and is gratified
when their new projections and explanations are released. They did indeed
perceive the same unexpected causes of high demand and elevate their
projections for final production of steel only a bit more than Sally had
thought warranted. Differential Productivity in "Competing"
Steel Plants One of the
more interesting differences between John Henry's plan and Northstart's is
that John Henry varies dramatically from the productivity norm for its
industry. Publishing companies are all able to attain comparable productivity
and any publisher producing below average output per input has to have
acceptable reasons for doing so. Some steel plants, however, have
technologies neither as pleasant to work with nor as efficient in outputs per
inputs as others because the yearly fall in demand for steel makes retooling
all existing plants inadvisable since the new capacity would just lie idle
some years down the road. Instead, selected old plants were only modestly
improved in the expectation that before too long the plants would be closed
or converted to other uses. The few plants needed to provide the lower steel
demand projected for the future were retooled extensively, but other plants
like John Henry were only minimally updated. Thus, during the year's
planning, John Henry's old technology cannot approach the productivity of the
completely retooled plants, or even live up to the industry average. The point, of
course, is that whereas in an employee-managed market economy workers at the
old plants would suffer lower incomes due to their plant's lower
capabilities, in a participatory economy no such penalty would arise. |
|