The Moral Rabbit Hole
The New York Times reported recently that U.S. soldiers still fighting the war in Afghanistan—14 years on—are under orders to be “culturally sensitive” regarding different attitudes among our Afghan allies about, uh…the sexual abuse of children. One officer was relieved of his command several years ago, the Times informed us, because he punched out an Afghan militia commander “for keeping a boy chained to his bed as a sex slave.” And in 2012, 3 Marines were shot and killed at a U.S. base in Helmand Province by a 17-year-old Afghan “tea boy” who may also have been the sex slave of a warlord ally stationed there—possibly in retaliation for the Marines’ failure to intervene in the situation. The father of one of the murdered Marines said that officers had told his son “to look the other way” regarding child rape “because it’s their culture.”
Shane Harris, writing a few days later in the Daily Beast, expanded on the moral helplessness of the American invaders in such matters: “A 45-minute scripted presentation given to Marines as part of their pre-deployment process…explains that laws and norms about sexual relations vary from country to country, and that in Afghanistan, in particular, sexual assault is a ‘cultural’ issue, and not a purely legal one…. The training guide supports allegations by Marines and Army soldiers in recent days that they’ve been told not to intervene to prevent sexual assault in Afghanistan, including the rape and sexual enslavement of children on U.S. bases.” Where does one start deconstructing the moral weirdness of all this? The stories don’t address the American invasion itself, which has shattered Afghanistan and created infinitely more harm than it has eradicated. Instead, we’re left seething at the scapegoat du jour: anonymous higher-ups, who are imposing strategically mandated directives on our boys on the ground and pedophile warlords are our partners in fighting the Taliban, but don’t look too closely at their leisure activities. In the Times story, in particular, a sense of American innocence permeates the situation. Our soldiers know better and want to do the right thing—impose decent values on a sleazy, immoral culture—but despite being armed to the teeth, they can’t force our allies to behave like “good Americans.” The real villain here, if we look no deeper than the Times chooses to, is political correctness.
All of this suggests to me that the fact that certain U.S. allies in Afghanistan, in the war against our former allies (the Taliban), who were wont to abuse local children sexually was not overlooked out of some screwball sensitivity to Afghan culture, but was cynically disregarded as irrelevant to the goal of defeating the enemy. What’s that you say? The “enemy” isn’t as bad as our friends? You’re missing the point. The point is victory. Here on the home front, where we continue to fund this and all our other insane wars, military “victory” remains a feel-good mirage, some sort of triumph of good over evil. In the ravaged countries where we actually wage our wars, there is only moral breakdown everywhere you turn. Indeed, it’s worth noting that sexual predation is built into American, and probably every other, military culture. Tens of thousands of women and men are raped in the U.S. armed forces every year; most of these incidents go unreported, because reporting a rape usually makes matters worse. That is, it’s not just in Afghanistan where “victims…risk blame and punishment for the crime that was committed against them,” as the Marine Corps training manual points out. It happens in every autocratic culture, including the U.S. military. The hammer of moral authority seldom falls on the ones who are in charge, no matter what they do.
So onward to victory, just be sensitive to the moral relativism of military culture and don’t look too closely at what we don’t want you to see.