Last Sunday, former NSA contractor and whistleblower Edward Snowden was interviewed for the German television network ARD. The interview was big news in Germany and much of the world in both print and broadcast media. However, the interview appears to have been blocked intentionally by US government authorities. In fact, the media in the US appears to have gone to ‘radio silence’ about it. It has been posted on YouTube several times, but is taken down almost immediately. The video site Vimeo has it embedded, but as I write this, Vimeo is under a DDoS attack. LiveLeak also has it, and that video is embedded in this report by Jay Syrmopoulos for Ben Swann’s news page.
Mr. Snowden spoke candidly in a thirty-minute English language interview with the reporter from ARD.
He says his “breaking point” was “seeing Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, directly lie under oath to Congress.” That was when Clapper denied the existence of a domestic spying programs when he testified before Congress in March of last year. Snowden added, “The public had a right to know about these programs. The public had a right to know that which the government is doing in its name, and that which the government is doing against the public.”
In case Ben Swann’s page is taken down, along with the LiveLeak video, here is the interview on Vimeo. Offered without commentary, since Edward Snowden can speak for himself.
ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.
Donate
2 Comments
In all the deletions of the interview video so far, the reason given is simply due to ARD asserting a copyright or it may more accurately a government funding regulation that prohibits distribution of their programming to non-German audiences. BBC has a similar policy, and since starting their separate “Al Jazeera America, Al Jazeera English blocks their video content to US audiences. A workaround for both these cases is to use a proxy server.
I don’t put it past US intelligence officials to block this video, but before engaging in conspiratorial thinking, shouldn’t someone check the more simple explanations first?
See it here: http://www.ndr.de/ratgeber/netzwelt/snowden271.html