avatar
Mount Temple


Tanya ReinhartIn

today’s setting, it is hard to recall that just a few years ago, only some

fringe lunatics demanded Israeli control of ‘Mount-temple’. Every time they

tried to enter the place and pray, Israeli police would be there to block their

entrance or drag them out. Even the word ‘mount temple’ was perceived as

belonging to the bizarre vocabulary of religious fanatics. Today it is the

Israeli government that launches the holy war. Israel’s foreign affairs minister

– the ex-liberal Shlomo Ben-Ami – declares day and night that "no nation

can give up its sacred sites" and the world nodes and accepts. Sharon could

not have entered the site without approval of Barak and the government. His

visit has been carefully planned, with a thousand soldiers securing it and

taking shooting positions on the roofs in advance. It is not Sharon who is

responsible for the present massacre, but Barak, Ben Ami, the Israeli

government, and Israel’s "peacenicks" who have been supporting them

all the way through.

Israel’s

claim on ‘mount temple’ is completely new (brought up only since the recent Camp

David negotiations). In 1995’s Beilin-Abu Maazen plan for the final agreement,

which is the basis for the present ‘negotiations’, it was still stated that the

area will be in ‘exterritorial Palestinian sovereignty'(1). The more Arafat

gives in, the more new demands are brought up by Israel.

The

Beilin Abu-Mazen document, itself, is a shameful document, which leaves all the

settlements untouched, and acknowledges Israeli sovereignty over most of the

central West Bank. It was agreed that Arafat will renounce, on behalf of the

Palestinians, any claim on Jerusalem, and the Palestinian institutions will move

to the village Abu-Dis, bordering with Jerusalem. In return, Arafat will be

allowed to call Abu-Dis the capital of the Palestinian state. The verbal trick

was that Abu-Dis will be named Al-Kuds, so it can be presented like the city is

divided to the Jewish part ‘Jerusalem’ and the Palestinian part ‘Al Kuds’.

Arafat has agreed to this long time ago. E.g. in ‘Haaretz’ 5.5.98 (Akiva Eldar)

it is reported that "Yaser Arafat accepts the idea that the capital of the

Palestinian state will be Abu-dis, neighboring Jerusalem, and sees the

understandings included in Beilin-Abu maazen agreement as a realistic option for

the final agreement with Israel." "In a meeting with the Middle East

section of the foreign affairs council whose center is in New-York… Arafat was

asked if it is possible to reach an agreement with Israel also on the question

of Jerusalem. Arafat: ‘Certainly, it is possible to accept the idea of Abu-Dis,

which belonged to Al-Kuds also under Jordanian rule."

Even

that was not good enough for Barak. In the original Beilin Abu-Mazen plan, only

the land with the Jewish settlements of the central WB (labelled

"Jerusalem") was to be annexed. – So they prepared a rather windy map

that surrounds these settlements but includes no Palestinians. Israel’s interest

in doing it this way was to avoid the need of giving these Palestinians Israeli

citizenship including social rights – health etc, or political rights of voting.

Barak ‘straightened’ the maps. The annexation proposed in Camp David will

include also the areas with Palestinian residents. But these residents will not

be given Israeli citizenship, since "they will vote for the Palestinian

state." So this enables annexing the land without giving any rights to the

annexed Palestinian residents (2).

It

appears that the Palestinian negotiators in Camp David have also agreed to this

proposal. Or at least we have never heard otherwise. But then Barak came up with

the new demand that the Palestinians will also renounce their hold in Al Aksa

(Mount Temple). Even a collaborator like Arafat cannot accept such a demand and

survive.

No

rational account could tie these facts together. It is hard to avoid the

conclusion that Barak is not interested now in any formal agreement with the

Palestinians, not even in the full surrender that Arafat was willing to accept.

Barak and Sharon, who may soon join him in power, see only one solution to the

‘Palestinian problem’ – elimination! It is not at all impossible that in their

sick general’s mind they believe that if one applies sufficient force, it may be

possible to drive more and more Palestinians out of Jerusalem and the central

bank, and get this land Arab-free. And it won’t be confined to the occupied

Palestinians. For several weeks now, Israeli Palestinians have been subject to

vicious attacks, and more and more voices in the media (orchestrated, as always,

from above) complain about how they have too many rights. Israel has become the

land of apartheid.

 

 =========

 

(1) 

Newsweek 17.9.00; ‘Haaretz 18.9.00.

(2) 

Nahum Barnea "Yediot Aharonot" 30.6.00: "The Arabs living in the

settlement blocks which will be annexed to Israel will have the same rights as

the Israelis living in Palestine: They will vote to the Palestinian state and

will live by its laws."

 

Tanya

Reinhart Tel Aviv University and the university of Utrecht.

http://www.tau.ac.il/~reinhart

 

 

 

Leave a comment